All Issue

2017 Vol.4, Issue 3
Assessment of Definitions and Models of River Restoration based on the Functions, Services, and Values of River Ecosystem

하천생태계 기능, 서비스, 가치 관점에서 본 하천복원 정의 및 모형의 고찰

Hyoseop Woo1*
우 효섭1*
1School of Earth Science and Environmental Engineering, Gwangju Institute of Science and Technology
1광주과학기술원 지구환경공학부
*교신저자. *Corresponding Author. 
30 September 2017. pp. 123-129
PDF XML Citation
Abstract

This study aims to identify and reduce the gaps of understandings and thoughts of river restoration between river engineers and ecologists by logically re-examining the definition and value of river restoration. For this purpose, function, and goods and services of river ecosystem are analyzed based on the study of those by de Groot et al. (2002). From the result of this analysis, definitions and strategies of presently-known river restoration and its similar activities are re-examined. Next, presently-known river restoration models, ERM (Ecological restoration model), ARM (Amenity restoration model) and semi-ERM (semi-Ecological restoration model), are reinforced in their frameworks. This study is expected to narrow the gap, between the professionals of different fields, of their understandings and thoughts of river restoration.

Keywords
하천복원
하천생태계의 기능
재화와 서비스
가치
하천복원모형

본 연구는 하천복원에 대해 하천기술자들과 생태학자들 간 이해와 사고의 간격을 확인하고 그 간격을 줄이기 위해 하천복원의 정의와 의의를 학술적, 논리적으로 재 고찰 하는 것이다. 이를 위해 우선 하천생태계의 기능, 재화와 용역에 대해 de Groot et al. (2002)의 자료에 근거하여 분석하였다. 이를 토대로 지금까지 알려진 하천복원을 포함한 유사 활동의 정의와 복원전략을 재 고찰 하였다. 그 다음 생태복원모형 (ERM), 어메너티복원모형 (ARM), 준생태복원모형 (semi-ERM) 등 기존의 하천복원모형의 개념을 보완하였다. 이 연구는 그 동안 하천복원에 대해 이해와 생각을 달리한 전문가들이 서로 간 사고의 간격을 줄이는데 도움이 될 것으로 기대된다.

키워드
River restoration
River ecosystem’s functions
Goods and services and values
River restoration models
References
1
Bradshaw, A.D. 1996. Underlying principles of restoration. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 53(Suppl. 1): 3-9.
2
Dufour, S. and Piégay, H. 2009. From the myth of a lost paradise to targeted river restoration: forget natural references and focus on human benefits. River Research and Applications 25(5): 568-581.
3
De Groot, R.S. et al. 2002.  A typology for the classification, description and valuation of ecosystem functions, goods, and services. Ecological Economics 41: 393-408.
4
KICT (Korea Institute of Construction Technology) and MOE (Ministry of Environment). 1996-2001. National R&D of Close-to-nature river restoration techniques that are applicable to the rivers in Korea. (in Korean)
5
Kim, K.H. and Woo, H. 2006. Ideal image and model of close-to-nature river works. Symposium proceedings of panel discussion on the right direction of close-to-nature river works and relevant legislation and proposal of local government on its governance. pp. 9-35. (in Korean)
6
MA (Millenium Ecosystem Assessment). 2005. Global Assessment Reports.
7
Limburg, K.E., et al. 2002. Complex systems and valuation. Ecological Economics 41: 409-420.
8
Rutherfurd, I.D, Jerie, K. and Marsh, N. 2000. A Rehabilitation Manual for Australian Streams, Vol. 1 and 2, published by Cooperative Research Center for Catchment Hydrology and Land and Water Resources and Development Corporation.
9
TU Delft. 2017. Hydraulic Engineering - River Engineering. http://www.citg.tudelft.nl/en/about-faculty/departments/department-of-hydraulic-engineering/sections/rivers-ports-waterways-and-dredging-works/river-engineering/  accessed on June 30, 2017.
10
USDC (United States Department of Commerce). FISRWG. 1998. Steam Corridor Restoration: Principles, Processes, and Practices.
11
Woo, H. 2004. Evolution and Prospect of River Works in Korea - Coordinate of Chenggye-cheon River Works. Korea Water Resources Magazine. 37: 1 (in Korean) 
12
Woo, H., Kim W. and Ji, Un. 2015. River Hydraulics. Chungmungak Press. 
13
Woo, H. and Kim, H.J. 2006. An urban stream restoration model focused on amenity: case of the Cheonggye-cheon, Korea. Proceedings of International Conference on Hydro-science and Engineering (ICHE). Philadelphia.
14
Woo, H. and Kim, H.T. 2010. The objective of river restoration - focused on naturalness or human service?. KSCE Annual Conference. pp. 217-221 (in Korean)
15
Woo. H. et al. 2017. Ecological Engineering - Fundamentals and Applications. Chungmungak Press. p. 318. (in Korean)
Information
  • Publisher :Korean Society of Ecology and Infrastructure Engineering
  • Publisher(Ko) :응용생태공학회
  • Journal Title :Ecology and Resilient Infrastructure
  • Journal Title(Ko) :응용생태공학회 논문집
  • Volume : 4
  • No :3
  • Pages :123-129
  • Received Date : 2017-07-03
  • Revised Date : 2017-07-14
  • Accepted Date : 2017-07-25
  • DOI :https://doi.org/10.17820/eri.2017.4.3.123
Journal Informaiton Ecology and Resilient Infrastructure Ecology and Resilient Infrastructure
Online Submission
  • NRF
  • KISTI Current Status
  • KISTI Cited-by
  • crosscheck
  • orcid
  • open access
  • ccl
Journal Informaiton Journal Informaiton - close