All Issue

2021 Vol.8, Issue 4 Preview Page

Original Article

31 December 2021. pp. 212-222
Abstract
References
1
Albayrak, I., Nikora, V., Miler, O. and O'Hare, M.T. 2014. Flow-plant interactions at leaf, stem and shoot scales: drag, turbulence, and biomechanics. Aquatic sciences 76(2): 269-294. 10.1007/s00027-013-0335-2
2
Arcement, G.J. and Schneider, V.R. 1989. Guide for selecting Manning's roughness coefficients for natural channels and flood plains. Denver: USGS.
3
Armanini, A., Righetti, M. and Grisenti, P. 2005. Direct measurement of vegetation resistance in prototype scale. Journal of Hydraulic Research 43(5): 481-487. 10.1080/00221680509500146
4
Augustijn, D.C., Huthoff, F. and van Velzen, E.H. 2008. Comparison of vegetation roughness descriptions. Altinakar, MS, Kokpinar, MA, Aydin, I., Cokgor, S. Kirkgoz, S.(eds.) River Flow, 2008, 343-350.
5
Baptist, M.J. 2005. Modelling floodplain biogeomorphology. PhD thesis, Delft University of Technology, Faculty of Civil Engineering and Geosciences, Section Hydraulic Engineering, Delft.
6
Bennett, S.J., Wu, W., Alonso, C.V. and Wang, S.S. 2008. Modeling fluvial response to in‐stream woody vegetation: implications for stream corridor restoration. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms: The Journal of the British Geomorphological Research Group 33(6): 890-909. 10.1002/esp.1581
7
Biggs, H.J., Nikora, V.I., Gibbins, C.N., Cameron, S.M., Papadopoulos, K., Stewart, M., Fraser, S., Vettori, D., Savio, M., O'Hare, M.T., Kucher, M. and Hicks, D.M. 2019. Flow interactions with an aquatic macrophyte: a field study using stereoscopic particle image velocimetry. Journal of Ecohydraulics 4(2): 113-130. 10.1080/24705357.2019.1606677
8
Chow, V.T. 1959. Open Channel Hydarulics. McGraw Hill, New York, NY.
9
De Doncker, L., Troch, P., Verhoeven, R., Bal, K., Meire, P. and Quintelier, J. 2009. Determination of the Manning roughness coefficient influenced by vegetation in the river Aa and Biebrza river. Environmental fluid mechanics 9(5): 549-567. 10.1007/s10652-009-9149-0
10
EC (European Commission). 2011. Biodiversity strategy https://ec.europa.eu/environment/nature/biodiversity/strategy/ Accessed 19 December 2019.
11
EC (European Commission). 2013. Building a green infrastructure for Europe. Catalog.
12
Green, J. C. 2005. Comparison of blockage factors in modelling the resistance of channels containing submerged macrophytes. River research and applications 21(6): 671-686. 10.1002/rra.854
13
Järvelä, J. 2002a. Flow resistance of flexible and stiff vegetation: a flume study with natural plants. Journal of hydrology 269(1-2): 44-54. 10.1016/S0022-1694(02)00193-2
14
Järvelä, J. 2002b. Determination of flow resistance of vegetated channel banks and floodplains. In River flow 2002, 311-318.
15
Järvelä, J. 2004. Determination of flow resistance caused by non‐submerged woody vegetation. International Journal of River Basin Management 2(1): 61-70. 10.1080/15715124.2004.9635222
16
Jia, Y. and Wang, S.S.Y. 2001. CCHE2D: Two-dimensional Hydrodynamic and Sediment Transport Model for Unsteady Open Channel Flows Over Loose Bed. NCCHE-TR- 2001-1, School of Engineering, The University of Mississippi.
17
Jordanova, A.A. and James, C.S. 2003. Experimental study of bed load transport through emergent vegetation. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering 129(6): 474-478. 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9429(2003)129:6(474)
18
MOE (Ministry of the Environment). 2016. Ecosystem- based disaster risk reduction in Japan. A handbook for The Government of Japan.
19
Nepf, H.M. 1999. Drag, turbulence, and diffusion in flow through emergent vegetation. Water Resources Research 35(2): 479-489. 10.1029/1998WR900069
20
Nikora, V., Larned, S., Nikora, N., Debnath, K., Cooper, G. and Reid, M. 2008. Hydraulic resistance due to aquatic vegetation in small streams: field study. Journal of hydraulic engineering 134(9): 1326-1332. 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9429(2008)134:9(1326)
21
Shucksmith, J.D., Boxall, J.B. and Guymer, I. 2011. Bulk flow resistance in vegetated channels: Analysis of momentum balance approaches based on data obtained in aging live vegetation. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering 137(12): 1624-1635. 10.1061/(ASCE)HY.1943-7900.0000457
22
Stone, M.C., Chen, L., Kyle McKay, S., Goreham, J., Acharya, K., Fischenich, C. and Stone, A.B. 2013. Bending of submerged woody riparian vegetation as a function of hydraulic flow conditions. River Research and Applications 29(2): 195-205. 10.1002/rra.1592
23
Stone, B.M. and Shen, H.T. 2002. Hydraulic resistance of flow in channels with cylindrical roughness. Journal of hydraulic engineering 128(5): 500-506. 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9429(2002)128:5(500)
24
Tanino, Y. and Nepf, H.M. 2008. Laboratory investigation of mean drag in a random array of rigid, emergent cylinders. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering 134(1): 34-41. 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9429(2008)134:1(34)
25
van Alphen, S. 2020. Room for the river: innovation, or tradition? The case of the Noordwaard. Adaptive strategies for water heritage, 309. 10.1007/978-3-030-00268-8_16
26
Wang, J. and Zhang, Z. 2019. Evaluating riparian vegetation roughness computation methods integrated within HEC- RAS. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering 145(6): 04019020. 10.1061/(ASCE)HY.1943-7900.0001597
27
Whittaker, P., Wilson, C.A. and Aberle, J. 2015. An improved Cauchy number approach for predicting the drag and reconfiguration of flexible vegetation. Advances in water resources 83: 28-35. 10.1016/j.advwatres.2015.05.005
28
Woo, H. and Han, S. 2020. Typological System of Nature-based Solutions and Its Similar Concepts on Water Management. Ecology and Resilient Infrastructure 7(1): 15-25. 10.1088/1755-1315/599/1/012094
Information
  • Publisher :Korean Society of Ecology and Infrastructure Engineering
  • Publisher(Ko) :응용생태공학회
  • Journal Title :Ecology and Resilient Infrastructure
  • Journal Title(Ko) :응용생태공학회 논문집
  • Volume : 8
  • No :4
  • Pages :212-222
  • Received Date :2021. 11. 17
  • Revised Date :2021. 11. 25
  • Accepted Date : 2021. 12. 01